Virginia Bids > Bid Detail

H261--Sources Sought 653-23-104 Electrical Study

Agency: VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF
Level of Government: Federal
Category:
  • H - Quality Control, Testing, and Inspection Services
Opps ID: NBD00159090512576705
Posted Date: Nov 19, 2022
Due Date: Dec 2, 2022
Solicitation No: 36C26023Q0083
Source: https://sam.gov/opp/8ccdff7fc1...
Follow
H261--Sources Sought 653-23-104 Electrical Study
Active
Contract Opportunity
Notice ID
36C26023Q0083
Related Notice
Department/Ind. Agency
VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF
Sub-tier
VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF
Office
260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)
Looking for contract opportunity help?

Procurement Technical Assistance Centers (PTACs) are an official government contracting resource for small businesses. Find your local PTAC (opens in new window) for free government expertise related to contract opportunities.

General Information
  • Contract Opportunity Type: Sources Sought (Original)
  • All Dates/Times are: (UTC-08:00) PACIFIC STANDARD TIME, LOS ANGELES, USA
  • Original Published Date: Nov 18, 2022 04:31 pm PST
  • Original Response Date: Dec 02, 2022 12:00 pm PST
  • Inactive Policy: Manual
  • Original Inactive Date: Dec 12, 2022
  • Initiative:
    • None
Classification
  • Original Set Aside:
  • Product Service Code: H261 - EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TESTING- ELECTRIC WIRE AND POWER DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT
  • NAICS Code:
    • 238210 - Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors
  • Place of Performance:
    Roseburg VA Medical Center 913 NW Garden Valley Boulevard ,
Description

DESCRIPTION
This is a SOURCES SOUGHT NOTICE (36C26023Q0083) in support of the Department of Veteran Affairs Roseburg VA Medical Center in Roseburg, OR for market research purposes only to determine the availability of potential businesses with capabilities to provide the requirement described below. This notice shall not be construed as a request for proposal/request for quote or as any commitment or obligation on the part of the Government to issue a solicitation. The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this request so proposals will not be considered. No reimbursement will be made for any costs associated with providing information in response to this synopsis or any follow-up information requests.

Response is strictly voluntary- it is not mandatory to submit a response to this notice to participate in any formal solicitation process that may take place in the future. However, it should be noted that information gathered through this notice may significantly influence our acquisition strategy. All interested parties will be required to respond separately to any solicitations posted as a result of this sources sought notice.

Anticipated North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 238210-Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors. The largest a firm can be and still qualify as a small business for Federal Government programs is a size standard of $16.5M
.

Interested parties are invited to respond via e-mail to helen.woods@va.gov. Responses will be used to determine the appropriate acquisition strategy. All responses due by 12/02/22 at 12:00 Pacific Standard Time.

Potential contractors shall provide, at a minimum, the following information (1-4):
1) Company name, address, and point of contact, phone number, e-mail address, and DUNS/EUID.

2) Is your firm eligible for participation in one of the following small business socio-economic programs? If so, please indicate the program.

[ ] yes [ ] no Small Business (SB)
[ ] yes [ ] no HUBZone
[ ] yes [ ] no Small Business 8(a)
[ ] yes [ ] no Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB)
[ ] yes [ ] no Women-Owned (WO) Small Business
[ ] yes [ ] no Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)
[ ] yes [ ] no Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB)
[ ] yes [ ] no Other (please specify)

3) What additional information would the Government need to provide for you to be able to submit an accurate and complete offer with full understanding of the requirements if we post a formal solicitation?

4) Provide a brief capability statement (Max 2 pages) with enough information to determine if your company can meet the requirement. The response must address key criteria:

A. Provide the approach as how your company would perform complete testing and maintenance of the electrical distribution system throughout the Roseburg Veterans Administration Medical Center campus located in Roseburg, OR

B. Describe how the Electrical Engineer is a licensed professional engineer and has at least five years of experience in performing power system studies or demonstrate an equivalent level of proficiency in performing and interpreting power system studies. Within this description, please include the understanding and methodology of how the engineer would provide the engineering analysis, short circuit study, coordination study, and arc flash study in accordance with NFPA 70E and VHA Directive 1028 for the entire campus.
C. Describe how the detailed test plan would encompass the proposed method of testing, sample test reports, proposed project schedule, and how coordination of shutdowns would occur.

D. Describe if you think the draft scope of work s period of performance is or is not reasonable in your opinion, and if not, why.

The Capabilities Statement for this sources sought is not expected to be a Request for Quotations, Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, nor does it restrict the Government to an ultimate acquisition approach, but rather the Government is requesting a short statement regarding the company s ability to provide the services outlined below. The capabilities will be evaluated solely for the purpose of determining to set-aside for the one of the socio-economic categories listed above or to conduct as an Unrestricted Procurement. Other than small businesses may respond to this notice in the event the market does not indicate SB interest. This synopsis is for information and planning purposes only and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government. The Government will not pay for information solicited. Respondents will not be notified of the results of the evaluation.

Note: Do not include Proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information in responses.

DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUIREMENT:

The Department of Veterans Affairs is looking to obtain information on companies who can provide the following draft scope of work:
DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK:

The Contractor shall perform an electrical system study and field inspection, testing and maintenance for the Roseburg VA Medical Center (VAMC). The purpose of this survey and maintenance work is to ensure 100% compliance with VHA Directive 1028 and establish a high state of electrical reliability.

All work shall be accomplished in strict compliance with current editions of NFPA-70E, (Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace), NFPA-70B (Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance), ANSI-MTS (American National Standards Institute Maintenance Testing Specifications for electrical); and IEEE 242-2001, Recommended Practice for Protection and Coordination of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems. All survey work will be accomplished on energized equipment unless an outage is required due to specific equipment safety conditions. All maintenance and repairs will require an equipment outage.
The electrical deficiency corrections shall be conducted by a team of licensed electricians under the authority of the lead Electrical Professional Engineer of the Consultant firm. The electrical contractor shall have replacement parts and equipment available. Repairs will consist predominantly of circuit breaker panel replacement and possible circuit breaker panel replacement (all new panels are to receive double hinged doors).
The Contractor shall prepare complete Short Circuit and Coordination studies including voltage drop calculations on the entire electrical system/s (both normal and emergency). It shall begin at the incoming utility electrical service (for the normal system) and at the emergency generators (for the emergency system) and continue through to each branch circuit panelboard, motor control center or motor control panel in each building. The study shall include a system one-line diagram; Short Circuit and ground fault analysis, protective coordination plots, voltage drop calculations and the following for each building:

One Line Diagrams:

The one-line diagrams shall show the schematic wiring of the electrical distribution system for each building. Include all electrical equipment and wiring protected by the over current devices.

Also show on the one-line diagrams the following specific information:
Calculated Short Circuit values at each bus.
Breaker and fuse ratings.
Transformer kVA, voltage ratings and wiring connections.
Voltage at each bus.
Identification of each bus.
Conduit material, feeder sizes and lengths.
Generator kW and voltage ratings.
Room Number for each electrical equipment including, but not limited to, the panelboard, disconnect, and transformer, etc.

Ground Resistance Analysis and Testing:

A concise qualitative description (not to exceed one (1) page of narrative) describing the overall condition of the facility ground resistance shall be provided. Any violations of NEC or other abnormalities (high ground resistance, damaged conductors or electrodes, harmonics, etc.) warranting further detailed study shall be highlighted. Analysis of the facility ground resistance shall be based upon ground resistance testing and visual inspection of visible ground system components (made during site investigation). Include photographs in Appendices. Interviews with VAMC engineering staff; and other data on ground system made available by the VAMC.

Short Circuit Study:

Perform a short circuit study in accordance with ANSI/IEEE standard 399 and the step-by-step procedures outlined in IEEE standard 141 and ANSI/IEEE 242. Systematically calculate the fault impedance to determine the available short circuit and ground fault currents at each bus. Incorporate the motor contribution in determining the momentary and interrupting ratings of the protective devices. Motors less than 25 HP may be grouped together.

The study shall be calculated by using SKM software. Pertinent data and the rationale employed in developing the calculations shall be incorporated in the introductory remarks of the study.
Use actual conductor impedances if known. If unknown, use typical conductor impedances based on IEEE Standard 141-1993.
Transformer design impedances shall be used when test impedances are not available.
Provide the following:
Calculation methods and assumptions
Selected base per unit quantities
SKM and Traditional One-line diagram of the system being evaluated
Source impedance data, including electric utility system and motor fault contribution characteristics
Tabulations of calculated quantities
Results, conclusions, and recommendations.

Calculate short-circuit momentary and interrupting duties for a three-phase bolted fault at each:
Electric utility s supply termination point
Incoming switchgear
Unit substation primary and secondary terminals
Low voltage switchgear
Motor control centers
Standby generators and automatic transfer switches
Branch circuit panelboards
Machine control panels
Bus Ducts
Other significant locations throughout the system.

For grounded systems, provide a bolted line-to-ground fault current study for areas as defined for the three-phase bolted fault short-circuit study.
Protective Device Evaluation:
Evaluate equipment and protective devices and compare to Short Circuit Ratings.
Adequacy of switchgear, motor control centers, and panelboard bus bars to withstand short-circuit stresses.
Notify Owner in writing, of existing, circuit protective devices improperly rated for the calculated available fault current.

Present the data determined by the Short Circuit study in a table format, include the following:
Transformer kVA and voltage ratings, percent impedance, X/R ratios and wiring connections.
Generator kW and voltage ratings.
Conduit material, feeder sizes, length and X/R ratios.
Device identification (Manufacturer, Catalog No. and Device Curve No. and ID)
Operating voltage.
Protective device.
Device rating.
Calculated Short Circuit current.
Hazard-Risk category at each piece of equipment for the worst-case fault condition.

Protective Device Coordination Study:

Determine the extent of overcurrent protective device coordination with the objective to maximize coordination of the overcurrent protective devices. Determine applied protective device characteristics, settings or sizes which will provide a balance between equipment protection and selective device operation that is optimum for the electrical system. Provide the analysis for the existing system and needed corrections that is optimum for the VAMC electrical system. The coordination study shall follow the procedures set forth in ANSI/IEEE standard 399 and ANSI standard 242. The selection and settings of new protection devices shall comply with the NEC.

Prepare the coordination curves to determine the required settings of protective devices to assure selective coordination. Graphically illustrate (using log scale) that adequate time separation exists between series devices, including the utility company upstream device. Plot the specific Time Current Characteristics (TCC) of each device in the electrical system as follows:

Provide TCC curve down to the last branch-circuit panelboard (regardless the protective device is an adjustable or fixed device) in the three-branches of the Essential Electrical System (EES).

Provide TCC curve down to the last adjustable device (stop after the first fixed device) in the Normal System but at the minimum two-level curves from each of the building Service Entrance switchgear/switchboard shall be provided.

The following specific information shall also be shown on the coordination curves at each level of power distribution system:

Device identification (including Manufacturer, Catalog Number, and Device Curve Number and ID)
Voltage and current ratio for curves.
3 phase and 1 phase ANSI damage points for each transformer.
No damage, melting, and clearing curves for fuses.
Cable damage curves.
Transformer inrush points.
Maximum Short Circuit cutoff point.
Excerpts from one-line diagram reflecting the protective devices modeled on each curve. This excerpt may be inserted onto a corner (typically top right-hand) of the curve print out or may be on the preceding facing page for ease of reference.
Provide explanation, analysis, and recommendation to achieve better coordination.
The analysis for recommended curve of a particular device shall be put right after the existing curve in the report for comparison.

Develop a table to summarize the settings selected for the protective devices. Include all medium voltage devices in the table, as well as all low voltage devices which require modification, showing the following data:
Device identification.
Relay CT ratios, tap, time dial, and instantaneous pickup.
Circuit breaker sensor rating, long time, short time, and instantaneous settings, and time bands.
Fuse rating and type.
Ground fault pickup and time delay.

Inspection Testing and Coordination of Circuit Breakers. This includes a visual inspection and electrical testing. Inspection and Testing procedures shall follow ANSI/NETA-MTS Chapter 7.6 for all low and medium voltage circuit breakers.
Record device tested
Provide a checklist for inspection and testing
Perform inspections and testing
Note conditions of each tested device
Replace faulted circuit breakers
Update table of summarized settings
Update protective devices in as one lines as needed.

Protective Device Settings:

For all adjustable and fixed protective devices, provide tables to show existing settings and new settings where changes are recommended for proper protection.
If adjustments will not provide adequate protection, provide recommendations to update or replace the existing underrated equipment and include cost estimates to accomplish the necessary corrections.
Provide table in Excel format to show ONLY the devices that require that their settings need adjustment. Add excel to deliverables
Arc Flash Hazard Analysis:

The arc flash hazard analysis shall be performed according to the IEEE Std. 1584-2002. These equations can also be found in NFPA 70E (2018), Annex D.
The flash protection boundary and the Incident Energy shall be calculated at all equipment locations referenced in IV.
The Arc-Flash Hazard Analysis shall include all significant locations in 240 volt and 208-volt systems fed from transformers equal to or greater than 125 kVA where work could be performed on energized parts.
Safe working distances shall be based upon the calculated arc flash boundary considering Incident Energy of 1.2 cal/cm2.
When appropriate, the Short Circuit calculations and the clearing times of the phase overcurrent devices will be retrieved from the Short-Circuit and Coordination Study model. Ground overcurrent relays should not be taken into consideration when determining the clearing time when performing Incident Energy calculations
The short-circuit calculations and the corresponding Incident Energy calculations for multiple system scenarios shall be compared and the greatest Incident Energy must be uniquely reported for each equipment location. Calculations must be performed to represent the maximum and minimum contributions of fault current magnitude for all normal and emergency operating conditions. The minimum calculation will assume that the utility contribution is at a minimum and will assume a minimum motor contribution (all motors off). Conversely, the maximum calculation will assume a maximum contribution from the utility and will assume the maximum quantity of motors to be operating. Calculations shall take into consideration the parallel operation of synchronous generators with the electric utility, where applicable.
The Incident Energy calculations must consider the accumulation of energy over time when performing arc flash calculations on buses with multiple sources. Iterative calculations must take into account the changing current contributions, as the sources are interrupted or decremented with time. Fault contribution from motors and generators should be decremented as follows:
Fault contribution from induction motors should not be considered beyond 3-5 cycles.
Fault contribution from synchronous motors and generators should be decayed to match the actual decrement of each as closely as possible (e.g., contributions from permanent magnet generators will typically decay from 10 per unit to 3 per unit after 10 cycles).
Each equipment location with a separately enclosed main device (where there is adequate separation between the line side terminals of the main protective device and the work location), calculations for Incident Energy and flash protection boundary shall include both the line and load side of the main breaker.
When performing Incident Energy calculations on the line side of a main breaker (as required per above), the line side and load side contributions must be included in the fault calculation.
Mis-coordination should be checked amongst all devices within the branch containing the immediate protective device upstream of the calculation location and the calculation should utilize the fastest device to compute the Incident Energy for the corresponding location.
Arc Flash calculations shall be based on actual overcurrent protective device clearing time. Maximum clearing time will be capped at 2 seconds based on IEEE Std. 1584-2002 section B.1.2. Where it is not physically possible to move outside of the flash protection boundary in less than 2 seconds during an arc flash event, a maximum clearing time based on the specific location shall be utilized.

Arc Flash Labeling:

Contractor shall produce and deliver, the Arc Flash Labeling, to the VAMC according to the number of distribution devices that are shown on the one-line diagram in accordance with NFPA 70 (NEC) and NFPA 70E. Labels shall be 4 x 6 (nominal) printed on industrial quality, adhesive backed vinyl. Danger labels shall have pre-printed headers in red; "Danger" labels shall be provided for equipment/devices having incident energy greater than or equal to 40 cal/Cm2; Warning labels shall have pre-printed headers in orange. "Warning" labels shall be provided for equipment/devices having incident energy less than 40 cal/cm2. Electrical equipment shall be labeled IAW NFPA 70, Articles 110.16 & 100.21(B) and NFPA70E, Article 130.5.

The arc flash hazard analysis to determine the Arc Flash Protection Boundary for each label shall be calculated IAW NFPA 70E Paragraph 130.5 (B).

(1) Nominal system voltage
(2) Arc flash boundary
(3) At least one of the following:
a. Available incident energy and the corresponding working distance, or the arc flash PPE category in Table 130.7(C)(15)(A)(b) or Table 130.7(C)(15)(B) for the equipment, but not both
b. Minimum arc rating of clothing
c. Specific level of PPE

In addition to the requirements of NFPA 70 and 70E, each customized label shall identify the corresponding piece of electrical equipment, by Panelboard or device identifier and Building number. The identification shall be in a manner (nomenclature) understood by VAMC Facility Management Personnel who will be applying the labels to the respective devices. Generic labels do not require equipment and building identifiers.
Arc flash labels shall be provided in the following manner and all labels shall be based on recommended overcurrent device settings.
For each 600, 480 and applicable 208-volt panelboard, one arc flash label shall be provided.
For each motor control center, one arc flash label shall be provided.
For each low voltage switchboard, one arc flash label shall be provided.
For each Switchgear, one flash label shall be provided.
For medium voltage switches one arc flash label shall be provided
For each machine control panel, one arc flash label shall be provided.
For each bus duct plug, one arc flash label shall be provided.
For each compartment of the transformer, one arc flash label shall be provided.

Load flow and Voltage Drop Calculations and Study:

Determine active and reactive power, voltage, current and power factor throughout the electrical system. Provide an analysis of the current operating scenario and recommendations for improvement. The low flow study shall follow the recommended procedures of ANSI/IEEE standard 399.

Provide voltage drop calculations for all three-phase branch and feeder circuits. Show calculated voltages at each bus and voltage drops on each feeder.
Calculations shall be based on the maximum values of kVA, kW, kvar, power factor and amperes for each power circuit.
a. For branch circuit level, use 80% of nameplate rating.
b. For incoming service and distribution level, use 50% of the nameplate rating or actual maximum peak demand load collected in the field if it is available.
Provide tabular information showing the sizes of all cables, transformers, and other circuit data.
Provide a system one-line diagram which clearly identifies individual equipment busses, bus numbers, cable and bus connections and other circuit information.
Provide a separate section or tables which provide an evaluation of the calculated voltage drops with recommendations for improvements where voltage drops exceed the allowable NEC limits.

Emergency Power System Analysis:

Currently there is an active project correcting Electrical Deficiencies (EDII) which is also replacing the old generator system with an upgraded emergency power system that will serve the medical center more effectively. This system may or may not be installed when the Electrical Study project begins.

To evaluate the emergency electrical system please provide an analysis of the generators recently or to be installed by EDII based on the following survey required information:

The contractor shall provide a narrative describing the existing emergency power system(s) at the medical center, to include a description of each emergency generator, physical location, size (kW and ampacity), voltage, configuration (phase, wire), circuit number, age, and overall condition. A summary of the average loading on each generator (based on data provided by the VAMC) shall be provided and then compared to projected future loads (A-E shall develop load projections from discussing forecast projects and growth with VAMC engineering staff), A-E shall provide a qualitative narrative on the suitability of the existing generators to meet projected future loads. If existing Emergency Power System, including generators, is not adequate to meet either current or future demands, recommendations shall be provided in the study. A-E shall summarize the findings in tabular form reflecting (as a minimum), the VAMC peak demand, average demand, transformer capacity and total generator capacity.

Stability Studies

Determine the ability of the electrical system s synchronous machines to remain in step with one another following a disturbance. Provide an analysis of the current VAMC operating conditions and recommendations for improvement. The stability study shall be performed in accordance with ANSI/IEEE standard 399.

Provide tabulations and equations used to record data and model the system components.
Provide a one-line diagram of the stability study
Provide assumptions, conclusions, and recommendations

Harmonic-Analysis Study
Determine the impact of nonlinear loads and associated harmonic contributions on voltage and currents throughout the electrical system. Provide an analysis of current operating conditions and provide recommendations. The harmonic analysis study shall be in accordance with ANSI/IEEE standard 399 and IEEE standard 3002.8.
Tabulations of the data used to model the system components and one line diagram.
Description of the operating scenario.
Tabulation of rms voltages, peak voltages, rms currents and total capacitor bank loading versus associated equipment rating.
Identify insufficient equipment ratings for the current operating condition and the recommended best operating condition.
Tabulations of calculated voltage distortion factors, current distortion factors and individual harmonics versus the limits specified in IEEE standard 519. Note values exceeding the limits specified in the IEEE standard in a spreadsheet.
Plots of impedance versus frequency showing resonant frequencies to be avoided.
Provide conclusion summary and recommendations.

Thermographic Survey

Perform a thermographic survey of electrical equipment. Reference the ANSI/NETA-MTA to perform the thermographic survey. The thermographic survey shall be performed in accordance with NFPA 70B. Note all abnormal hotspots in the electrical system. Record results by building in a spreadsheet. Provide a summary of your findings, no more than one page.

Electromagnetic Field Survey

Perform an electromagnetic field survey. Identify any locations of high electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure. Assess exposures to time-varying EMFs static electric fields and static magnetic fields. Reference the ANSI/NETA-MTA to perform the electromagnetic field survey. The magnetic field survey shall be performed in accordance with IEEE 644. Note significant results that may potentially cause problems for electrical equipment used in the facility. Results shall be recorded in a spreadsheet by building. Provide a summary of your findings, no more than one page.

Analysis and Recommendations:

For all electrical equipment, determine if adequate code clearances exist. Note cases by site, building and specific equipment that do not include adequate code clearances and provide a cost estimate to resolve the problems. Provide information in table format.
Determine if ground fault protection exists where required by NFPA 70 Articles 215 and 517. Note all cases where this condition exists and provide cost estimates to correct. Provide information in table format.
For all automatic transfer switches, determine if the correct 3-pole or 4-pole switches are used. Where ground fault protection is used on the normal feed to the switch, determine if the switch is correctly wired. Note all cases where this condition exists and provide cost estimates to correct. Provide information in table format.
Note any use of cable limiters and provide recommendations to avoid any single phasing conditions. Note all cases where this condition exists and provide cost estimates to correct. Provide information in table format.
On the medium voltage switchgear, where undervoltage relays (27) are used, determine whether all 3 phases are monitored or only 2 phases are monitored. For those locations where only 2 phases are monitored, provide a cost estimate for providing adequate protection for all 3 phases.
Analyze the Short Circuit calculations and highlight any equipment that is determined to be underrated. Provide recommendations to effectively protect the underrated equipment.
After developing the coordination curves, highlight areas lacking coordination. Present a technical evaluation with a discussion of the logical compromises for best coordination.
Assess the equipment condition using grading method in term of A, B, C, D and F.

Grade A - Like New Condition. Majority of useful life span remains. "Excellent"
Grade B - Good Condition. Over half of useful life span remains. "Good"
Grade C - Average Condition. Less than half of useful life span remains. "Average" or "Fair"
or C+ "Above Average"
Grade C - Workable Condition. May be past assigned useful life, but still working. "Keep an eye on it"
Grade D - Poor Condition. Past assigned useful life. Failure is not critical. "Poor" or "Problematic". Plan replacement prior to becoming critical.
Grade F - Critical Condition. Needs immediate attention. "Failing" or "Critical". Could result in sever injury or death.
Visual, Mechanical and Electrical Inspection, Cleaning, Testing and Maintenance

This section of the project requires the Lead Electrician to verify the Survey findings and make repairs accordingly. In addition to new findings the Lead Electrical Engineer shall note the equipment installed or soon to be installed by EDII, which shall be confirmed by the Lead Electrician.

The Lead Electrical Engineer shall provide a planned outage schedule for the Survey identified deficiencies. For forecasted work parts and equipment must be available on site prior to making repairs. All electrical components shall be visually inspected, cleaned and tested mechanically and electrically. All electrical components on testing schedule must have replacements on hand. Inspection and testing procedures shall follow ANSI/NETA-Maintenance and Testing Specifications. Inspection and Testing procedures are found in ANSI/NETA-MTS chapter 7. Testing and maintenance shall be conducted following survey data collection, evaluation, calculation and as built diagrams completion. Maintenance items identified during the survey will be provided by the Lead Professional Electrical Engineer. The specified maintenance items will be pre-approved by the COR. Components that do not meet expectations shall be repaired or replaced to meet the requirements identified by the Principle Electrical Engineer. The COR shall be notified about additional required repairs found during the electrical inspection and testing performed by the electrical contractor. A quote for additional repairs not previously noted by the Lead Electrical Engineer and required to eliminate deficiencies shall be provided to the COR for review.

For each building record equipment condition and data as found. Perform maintenance and record equipment condition post repair. Outages will be required for maintenance; schedule outages with the COR at least three (3) weeks prior to outage for coordination with all affected parties. Record all data in a spreadsheet. The visual, mechanical and electrical inspection and testing maintenance operation includes, but is not limited to the following items:

Switchgear and Switchboard Assemblies
Transformers Inspection and Testing
Dry Type, Air Cooled, Low Voltage, Small
Dry Type, Air Cooled, Low Voltage, Large
Liquid Filled
Cables Low and Medium Voltage
Low Voltage up to 600 Volts
Medium Voltage
Metal Enclosed Busways
Switches
Circuit Switchers
Network Protectors
Protective Relays utilize AE provided checklist. Replace defective circuit breakers.
Instrument Transformers
Metering Devices
Regulating Apparatus
Grounding Systems
Low Voltage Ground Fault Protection Systems
Medium Voltage Ground Fault Protection Systems
Rotating Machinery
AC Induction Motors and Generators
Synchronous Motors and Generators
DC Motors and Generators
Motor Control
Motor Starters Low and Medium voltage
Motor Control Centers Low and Medium voltage
Adjustable Speed Drive Systems
Direct Current Systems - Rectifiers
Batteries
Chargers
Surge Arresters Low and Medium Voltage
Capacitors and Reactors
Outdoor Bus Structures
Emergency System
Generator Diesel Engines
Uninterruptable Power System
Automatic Transfer Switches
Communications
Automatic Circuit Reclosers and Line Sectionalizers oil and vacuum
Fiber Optic Cables
System Function Tests
Perform system function tests to prove that corrective actions are operational and meet expectations and requirements. Record the tests performed and the results of the tests in a spreadsheet.
The Electrical Contractor shall red-line the AE provided One-line drawings with any changes made to the system.
AE - update the One-lines
AE - provide a final report of testing and maintenance conclusions.

Electrical Study Corrections

The electrical contractor shall make repairs or corrections when deficiencies are discovered while performing reliability testing procedures. Maintenance and repairs shall be made by the qualified electrician in accordance with the ANSI/NETA-Maintenance and Testing Specifications with confirmation provided by the Lead Principal Electrical Engineer. It is expected that approximately 10 percent of the Medical Facility s components (i.e. circuit breakers, panels, etc.) will be deficient in current operating condition based on average percentage requiring correction in similar projects.

An electrical components sheet will be supplied. It is current as of year 2017 and shall be confirmed as part of the field inspection/corrections effort.

The contractor must supply equipment for all testing. This includes but is not limited to, ladders, carts, cleaning equipment, test equipment and safety equipment. Equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly maintained while on the project and shall be adequate in quality and suitable for proper execution of work. General project housekeeping shall be neat and orderly to avoid creating safety hazards.

Cost Estimates:

For each building included in the electrical study at each Medical Center, where recommendations are to replace or update the existing electrical system to provide adequate protection, provide estimated construction costs for the necessary work. Necessary work is deficiencies that are found during the electrical survey and additional work found during the electrical inspection, maintenance, and testing in addition to the repair of components identified above under the section titled Electrical Study corrections. The estimates will be reviewed by the COR prior to any further action.
Total costs for each building shall be included in addition to an itemized breakdown to identify major items requiring replacement or upgrading.
Cost estimates shall not include adjustments for anticipated phasing, shutdowns or overtime work.
An electronic copy of the Cost Estimate in a spreadsheet shall be included in the submission of the final, corrected study. The spreadsheet will be used to track mitigation efforts.
Urgent items that pose a threat to life and/or reliability of the Roseburg VAMC shall be immediately reported to the project COR.

Deliverables:
60% submission SHALL include:

Letter from local electric utility provider (Pacific Power) indicating the available fault current at the point of service.
Executive Summary.
Minutes of the Entrance Briefing with Facility Projects Chief to include VHA Directive 1028 and Compliance Survey.
Analysis and calculations for the Primary Distribution System and partial Secondary Distribution System for each building including switchgear, switchboard, and distribution panel, etc. The analysis shall include Short Circuit Study and Protective Device Coordination Curves.
The analysis shall be based on the actual device data (including but not limited to fuses, breakers, and relays).

90% submission SHALL include:

All Content from 60% submittal (including updates below)
Deficiencies report and cost estimates.
All comments from 60% submission with annotations and responses.
All items identified in Para. 5, Specific Scope, as a separate Tab or Section to include:

Full Campus SKM and Traditional One-Line Diagrams
Note equipment not in service
Grounding Analysis
Short Circuit Study
Hazard-Risk Table
Coordination Curves
Voltage Drop Calculations
Emergency Power Analysis
Recommendations
Protective Device Settings
Excel spread sheet for devices that require adjustments
Cost Estimates
Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) Excel spreadsheet
Deficiency Report
Cost Estimate Excel spread sheet
MS Project outage schedule for testing and maintenance

Completed analysis and calculations for the entire Primary and Secondary Distribution.
Completed one-line diagrams. Each building on the Building List that is attached to the Scope of Work shall be identified on the diagrams.

For Final Submission, provide two digital copies (compact disc) of the electrical system study (including data files).

One original document of Final Submission shall be sent to Facility Chief of Projects at the VAMC and shall include:

A completed Report, including all corrected data from the 60% and 90% submittals and the coordination curves shall be in color. The completed report shall include an Executive Summary directed to the Medical Center Director or designee that includes a prioritized overview of the deficiencies found and the potential consequences if such deficiencies are not corrected.
Responses to the 60% and 90% submission comments from the VAMC Peer Review including annotations and response.
Digital copy (CD) of the entire report including all SKM data, AutoCAD, Word, Excel files and PDF.
Color photos that show devices listed on the deficiency report.
Arc Flash Hazard Warning labels compliant with requirements of latest NFPA 70E edition. NOTE: Arc Flash Hazard Warning labels need only to be provided to the VAMC.
Provide final report with stamp and signature by a Licensed Professional Electrical Engineer.

Period of Performance: 238 days

Qualifications:
The short-circuit, protective device coordination and arc flash hazard analysis studies shall be conducted under the supervision and approval of a Registered Professional Electrical Engineer skilled in performing and interpreting the power system studies.
The Registered Professional Electrical Engineer shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in performing power system studies or a proven equivalent level of proficiency.
The Contractor or approved engineering firm shall demonstrate experience with Arc Flash Hazard Analysis by submitting names of actual arc flash hazard analysis it has performed in the past.
The lead electrician contractor must hold a level three (3) or higher electrical testing certification with five (5) years of experience performing medium voltage repairs and maintenance. The certification shall be in accordance with ANSI/NETA ETT, Standard for Certification of Electrical Testing Technicians.
Attachments/Links
Contact Information
Contracting Office Address
  • 5115NE 82ND AVE SUITE 102
  • VANCOUVER , WA 98662
  • USA
Primary Point of Contact
Secondary Point of Contact


History
  • Nov 18, 2022 04:31 pm PSTSources Sought (Original)

TRY FOR FREE

Not a USAOPPS Member Yet?

Get unlimited access to thousands of active local, state and federal government bids and awards in All 50 States.

Start Free Trial Today >